Perspectives

Analysis on evidence architecture and the shifting HTA landscape

May 2026 · Evidence standards

Evidence standards were built for a world where researchers read before they cited

LLMs now bring science directly to consumers. Editorial and peer review standards were built for researcher-to-researcher communication. They need to reflect a world where the public is more exposed — and the stakes for errors are higher.

Read

May 2026 · Regulatory landscape

Europe didn’t fall behind by accident

The FDA is moving toward real-time clinical trials. Europe’s share of global clinical investment has collapsed from 22% to 12% over a decade. The bottleneck isn’t approval — it’s access. And Europe designed this outcome.

Read

April 2026 · HTA policy

The illusion of scientific neutrality in HTA

The HAS open letter functions less like a defence and more like an involuntary confession. HTA is not pure science — it is a purchasing decision informed by scientific inputs.

Read

April 2026 · Market access

Who actually owns market access decisions after MFN?

With US reimbursement now pegged to OECD reference prices, the US is inside the reference pricing web for the first time. Market access decisions can no longer be made in isolation.

Read

April 2026 · Innovation policy

Is Europe fixing its innovation problem at the wrong end?

Regulators see acceleration. Market access sees what’s waiting at the other end. Jan Geissler at DIA Europe: “We don’t have an innovation problem. We have an access problem.”

Read